wikipedia.org Website Health Report
Wikipedia
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
Analyzed 8/2/2026, 3:40:45 AM · https://wikipedia.org
⚠ No sitemap found — robots.txt declares none and the conventional locations return nothing.
Summary
As of August 2, 2026, wikipedia.org scores 52/100 overall (grade D), ranking #739 of 995 websites in the E:LAB STUDIO database — the top 75%. Its strongest area is Speed (99/100); its weakest is Schema (0/100).
Its AI-search visibility (AEO) score is 35/100 — a measure of how citable the page is to AI answer engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity. No JSON-LD structured data was detected — the single highest-impact gap for AI search. Top fixes: Organization schema, FAQ schema, Company/brand identity (About page or Org schema).
Speed scores 99/100: the server answered in 39ms, the HTML weighs 118 KB, compression is on, and 0 render-blocking resources sit in <head>. Security scores 55/100: the site is served over HTTPS and is missing the Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy headers.
Compared with the database average (61/100 overall), wikipedia.org scores 9 points lower.
How to improve
25Based on this report, here are the highest-impact fixes across SEO, AI-search visibility, speed and security:
Want us to fix these for you?
Request a site fixSEO
- ✓Title tag present10/10
- ✓Meta description present10/10
- ✓H1 heading present10/10
- ✗Canonical URL set0/10
- ✓Open Graph tags present10/10
- ✗sitemap.xml found0/10
- ✓robots.txt found10/10
- ✗Images have alt text0/10
- ✓Internal links present10/10
- ✗Structured data present0/10
AI Visibility (AEO)
- ✗Organization schema0/15
- ✗FAQ schema0/15
- ✓Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic)15/15
- ✗Company/brand identity (About page or Org schema)0/10
- ✗Author / publish date present0/10
- ✓Structured heading (single clear H1)10/10
- ✓External source/citation links10/10
- ✗Industry/location info0/10
- ✗Price/product info0/5
Schema
- ✗Any JSON-LD present0/20
- ✗Organization0/15
- ✗FAQPage0/15
- ✗LocalBusiness0/15
- ✗Article or Product0/15
- ✗Breadcrumb0/10
- ✗Author/date structured0/10
Technical
- ✓robots.txt found15/15
- ✗sitemap.xml found0/15
- ✗Canonical URL set0/15
- ✓Mobile viewport meta15/15
- ✓Language attribute set10/10
- ✓Open Graph tags10/10
- ✗Title length is optimal0/10
- ✓Description length is optimal10/10
Speed
- ✓Fast server response (TTFB)25/25
- ✓HTML delivered quickly15/15
- ✓Compression enabled15/15
- ◐HTML payload is lean9/10
- ✓Browser caching headers10/10
- ✓Few render-blocking resources15/15
- –Images are lazy-loadedN/A
- ✓Images have explicit dimensions5/5
Security
- ✓Served over HTTPS20/20
- ✓HTTP redirects to HTTPS10/10
- ✓TLS certificate not near expiry5/5
- ✓HSTS header15/15
- ✗Content-Security-Policy header0/12
- ✗X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff0/8
- ✗Clickjacking protection0/8
- ✗Referrer-Policy header0/7
- ✗Permissions-Policy header0/5
- ✓No mixed content5/5
- ✗Server version not disclosed0/5
Want a higher score than this site?
Run a free health check on your own site and get a prioritized fix list.
Check my siteWhat clients said
10 reviews, 5.0 average, 4 of them from repeat clients.
Left on Kmong, Korea's largest freelance marketplace. Shown in the original Korean, word for word — translating someone else's review would be rewriting it.
FAQ about wikipedia.org
What is wikipedia.org's SEO score?
wikipedia.org scores 60/100 for on-page SEO and 52/100 overall (grade D) — rank #739 of 995 sites in the E:LAB STUDIO database.
Is wikipedia.org visible to AI search engines like ChatGPT?
Its AI-visibility score is low at 35/100. Priority gaps: Organization schema, FAQ schema.
What technology does wikipedia.org use?
No specific framework or CMS was detectable from its public HTML.
What should wikipedia.org fix first?
Based on this report: Organization schema, FAQ schema. The full prioritized list is in the "How to improve" section below.
When was this report generated?
On August 2, 2026, from publicly fetched HTML. Anyone can re-run the analysis for free to refresh it.
Compare with similar sites
Free website checkers
Add this score badge to your site
Copy the snippet to show a live E:LAB STUDIO badge that links back to this report.