wa.gov Website Health Report
Home - WA.GOV
Analyzed 8/2/2026, 3:45:18 AM · https://wa.gov
Summary
As of August 2, 2026, wa.gov scores 59/100 overall (grade C), ranking #587 of 995 websites in the E:LAB STUDIO database — the top 59%. Its strongest area is Technical (90/100); its weakest is Schema (0/100).
Its AI-search visibility (AEO) score is 35/100 — a measure of how citable the page is to AI answer engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity. No JSON-LD structured data was detected — the single highest-impact gap for AI search. Top fixes: Organization schema, FAQ schema, Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic).
Speed scores 76/100: the server answered in 448ms, the HTML weighs 181 KB, compression is on, and 9 render-blocking resources sit in <head>. Security scores 76/100: the site is served over HTTPS and is missing the Content-Security-Policy, Referrer-Policy headers.
Detected tech stack: React, WordPress. Compared with the database average (61/100 overall), wa.gov scores 2 points lower.
How to improve
25Based on this report, here are the highest-impact fixes across SEO, AI-search visibility, speed and security:
Want us to fix these for you?
Request a site fixDetected technologies
SEO
- ✓Title tag present10/10
- ✗Meta description present0/10
- ✓H1 heading present10/10
- ✓Canonical URL set10/10
- ✓Open Graph tags present10/10
- ✓sitemap.xml found10/10
- ✓robots.txt found10/10
- ◐Images have alt text9/10
- ✓Internal links present10/10
- ✗Structured data present0/10
AI Visibility (AEO)
- ✗Organization schema0/15
- ✗FAQ schema0/15
- ◐Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic)5/15
- ✓Company/brand identity (About page or Org schema)10/10
- ✗Author / publish date present0/10
- ✓Structured heading (single clear H1)10/10
- ✓External source/citation links10/10
- ✗Industry/location info0/10
- ✗Price/product info0/5
Schema
- ✗Any JSON-LD present0/20
- ✗Organization0/15
- ✗FAQPage0/15
- ✗LocalBusiness0/15
- ✗Article or Product0/15
- ✗Breadcrumb0/10
- ✗Author/date structured0/10
Technical
- ✓robots.txt found15/15
- ✓sitemap.xml found15/15
- ✓Canonical URL set15/15
- ✓Mobile viewport meta15/15
- ✓Language attribute set10/10
- ✓Open Graph tags10/10
- ✓Title length is optimal10/10
- ✗Description length is optimal0/10
Speed
- ◐Fast server response (TTFB)23/25
- ✓HTML delivered quickly15/15
- ✓Compression enabled15/15
- ◐HTML payload is lean8/10
- ✓Browser caching headers10/10
- ◐Few render-blocking resources5/15
- ✗Images are lazy-loaded0/5
- ✗Images have explicit dimensions0/5
Security
- ✓Served over HTTPS20/20
- ✓HTTP redirects to HTTPS10/10
- ✓TLS certificate not near expiry5/5
- ✓HSTS header15/15
- ✗Content-Security-Policy header0/12
- ✓X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff8/8
- ✓Clickjacking protection8/8
- ✗Referrer-Policy header0/7
- ✗Permissions-Policy header0/5
- ✓No mixed content5/5
- ✓Server version not disclosed5/5
Want a higher score than this site?
Run a free health check on your own site and get a prioritized fix list.
Check my siteWhat clients said
10 reviews, 5.0 average, 4 of them from repeat clients.
Left on Kmong, Korea's largest freelance marketplace. Shown in the original Korean, word for word — translating someone else's review would be rewriting it.
FAQ about wa.gov
What is wa.gov's SEO score?
wa.gov scores 79/100 for on-page SEO and 59/100 overall (grade C) — rank #587 of 995 sites in the E:LAB STUDIO database.
Is wa.gov visible to AI search engines like ChatGPT?
Its AI-visibility score is low at 35/100. Priority gaps: Organization schema, FAQ schema.
What technology does wa.gov use?
From its public HTML we detected React, WordPress.
What should wa.gov fix first?
Based on this report: Organization schema, FAQ schema. The full prioritized list is in the "How to improve" section below.
When was this report generated?
On August 2, 2026, from publicly fetched HTML. Anyone can re-run the analysis for free to refresh it.
Compare with similar sites
Free website checkers
Add this score badge to your site
Copy the snippet to show a live E:LAB STUDIO badge that links back to this report.