tosspayments.com Website Health Report
토스페이먼츠
PG 도입 고민하고 있다면? 쉽고 빠르게 연동할 수 있는 토스페이먼츠를 선택하세요. 카드, 계좌이체, 빌링, 간편결제 등 온라인 사업에 필요한 모든 전자결제수단을 바로 이용할 수 있습니다.
Analyzed 8/2/2026, 3:37:07 AM · https://tosspayments.com
Summary
As of August 2, 2026, tosspayments.com scores 60/100 overall (grade C), ranking #577 of 995 websites in the E:LAB STUDIO database — the top 58%. Its strongest area is Technical (90/100); its weakest is Schema (35/100).
Its AI-search visibility (AEO) score is 49/100 — a measure of how citable the page is to AI answer engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity. 5 structured-data types detected (Organization, ContactPoint, WebSite, SearchAction). Top fixes: FAQ schema, Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic), Author / publish date present.
Speed scores 62/100: the server answered in 1307ms, the HTML weighs 60 KB, compression is on, and 21 render-blocking resources sit in <head>. Security scores 45/100: the site is served over HTTPS and is missing the HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy headers.
Detected tech stack: Next.js. Compared with the database average (61/100 overall), tosspayments.com scores 1 point lower.
How to improve
23Based on this report, here are the highest-impact fixes across SEO, AI-search visibility, speed and security:
Want us to fix these for you?
Request a site fixDetected technologies
SEO
- ✓Title tag present10/10
- ✓Meta description present10/10
- ✗H1 heading present0/10
- ✓Canonical URL set10/10
- ✓Open Graph tags present10/10
- ✓sitemap.xml found10/10
- ✓robots.txt found10/10
- –Images have alt textN/A
- ✗Internal links present0/10
- ✓Structured data present10/10
AI Visibility (AEO)
- ✓Organization schema15/15
- ✗FAQ schema0/15
- ◐Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic)14/15
- ✓Company/brand identity (About page or Org schema)10/10
- ✗Author / publish date present0/10
- ✗Structured heading (single clear H1)0/10
- ✗External source/citation links0/10
- ✓Industry/location info10/10
- ✗Price/product info0/5
Schema
- ✓Any JSON-LD present20/20
- ✓Organization15/15
- ✗FAQPage0/15
- ✗LocalBusiness0/15
- ✗Article or Product0/15
- ✗Breadcrumb0/10
- ✗Author/date structured0/10
Technical
- ✓robots.txt found15/15
- ✓sitemap.xml found15/15
- ✓Canonical URL set15/15
- ✓Mobile viewport meta15/15
- ✓Language attribute set10/10
- ✓Open Graph tags10/10
- ✓Title length is optimal10/10
- ✗Description length is optimal0/10
Speed
- ◐Fast server response (TTFB)8/25
- ◐HTML delivered quickly13/15
- ✓Compression enabled15/15
- ✓HTML payload is lean10/10
- ✓Browser caching headers10/10
- ✗Few render-blocking resources0/15
- –Images are lazy-loadedN/A
- –Images have explicit dimensionsN/A
Security
- ✓Served over HTTPS20/20
- ✓HTTP redirects to HTTPS10/10
- ✓TLS certificate not near expiry5/5
- ✗HSTS header0/15
- ✗Content-Security-Policy header0/12
- ✗X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff0/8
- ✗Clickjacking protection0/8
- ✗Referrer-Policy header0/7
- ✗Permissions-Policy header0/5
- ✓No mixed content5/5
- ✓Server version not disclosed5/5
Want a higher score than this site?
Run a free health check on your own site and get a prioritized fix list.
Check my siteWhat clients said
10 reviews, 5.0 average, 4 of them from repeat clients.
Left on Kmong, Korea's largest freelance marketplace. Shown in the original Korean, word for word — translating someone else's review would be rewriting it.
FAQ about tosspayments.com
What is tosspayments.com's SEO score?
tosspayments.com scores 78/100 for on-page SEO and 60/100 overall (grade C) — rank #577 of 995 sites in the E:LAB STUDIO database.
Is tosspayments.com visible to AI search engines like ChatGPT?
Its AI-visibility score is 49/100 — middling. Highest-impact improvements: FAQ schema, Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic).
What technology does tosspayments.com use?
From its public HTML we detected Next.js.
What should tosspayments.com fix first?
Based on this report: FAQ schema, Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic). The full prioritized list is in the "How to improve" section below.
When was this report generated?
On August 2, 2026, from publicly fetched HTML. Anyone can re-run the analysis for free to refresh it.
Compare with similar sites
Free website checkers
Add this score badge to your site
Copy the snippet to show a live E:LAB STUDIO badge that links back to this report.