samsung.com Website Health Report
Galaxy Z Fold8 | Batterij, Camera & Functies | Samsung NL
Ontdek de Galaxy Z Fold8, nu in een compleet nieuw design. Ervaar Galaxy AI en krachtige prestaties in Samsungs meest innovatieve opvouwbare telefoon tot nu toe.
Analyzed 8/2/2026, 3:39:09 AM · https://samsung.com
Summary
As of August 2, 2026, samsung.com scores 73/100 overall (grade B), ranking #221 of 995 websites in the E:LAB STUDIO database — the top 23%. Its strongest area is SEO (98/100); its weakest is Speed (54/100).
Its AI-search visibility (AEO) score is 65/100 — a measure of how citable the page is to AI answer engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity. 15 structured-data types detected (WebPage, ItemPage, Product, BuyAction). Top fixes: Organization schema, Author / publish date present, Industry/location info.
Speed scores 54/100: the server answered in 1031ms, the HTML weighs 4682 KB, compression is on, and 10 render-blocking resources sit in <head>. Security scores 68/100: the site is served over HTTPS and is missing the Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy headers.
Compared with the database average (61/100 overall), samsung.com scores 12 points higher, and ranks #10 of 13 Ecommerce sites we've analyzed.
How to improve
18Based on this report, here are the highest-impact fixes across SEO, AI-search visibility, speed and security:
Want us to fix these for you?
Request a site fixSEO
- ✓Title tag present10/10
- ✓Meta description present10/10
- ✓H1 heading present10/10
- ✓Canonical URL set10/10
- ✓Open Graph tags present10/10
- ✓sitemap.xml found10/10
- ✓robots.txt found10/10
- ◐Images have alt text8/10
- ✓Internal links present10/10
- ✓Structured data present10/10
AI Visibility (AEO)
- ✗Organization schema0/15
- ✓FAQ schema15/15
- ✓Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic)15/15
- ✓Company/brand identity (About page or Org schema)10/10
- ✗Author / publish date present0/10
- ✓Structured heading (single clear H1)10/10
- ✓External source/citation links10/10
- ✗Industry/location info0/10
- ✓Price/product info5/5
Schema
- ✓Any JSON-LD present20/20
- ✗Organization0/15
- ✓FAQPage15/15
- ✗LocalBusiness0/15
- ✓Article or Product15/15
- ✓Breadcrumb10/10
- ✗Author/date structured0/10
Technical
- ✓robots.txt found15/15
- ✓sitemap.xml found15/15
- ✓Canonical URL set15/15
- ✓Mobile viewport meta15/15
- ✓Language attribute set10/10
- ✓Open Graph tags10/10
- ✓Title length is optimal10/10
- ✗Description length is optimal0/10
Speed
- ◐Fast server response (TTFB)13/25
- ◐HTML delivered quickly13/15
- ✓Compression enabled15/15
- ✗HTML payload is lean0/10
- ✓Browser caching headers10/10
- ◐Few render-blocking resources3/15
- ✗Images are lazy-loaded0/5
- ✗Images have explicit dimensions0/5
Security
- ✓Served over HTTPS20/20
- ✓HTTP redirects to HTTPS10/10
- ✓TLS certificate not near expiry5/5
- ✓HSTS header15/15
- ✗Content-Security-Policy header0/12
- ✗X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff0/8
- ✓Clickjacking protection8/8
- ✗Referrer-Policy header0/7
- ✗Permissions-Policy header0/5
- ✓No mixed content5/5
- ✓Server version not disclosed5/5
Want a higher score than this site?
Run a free health check on your own site and get a prioritized fix list.
Check my siteWhat clients said
10 reviews, 5.0 average, 4 of them from repeat clients.
Left on Kmong, Korea's largest freelance marketplace. Shown in the original Korean, word for word — translating someone else's review would be rewriting it.
FAQ about samsung.com
What is samsung.com's SEO score?
samsung.com scores 98/100 for on-page SEO and 73/100 overall (grade B) — rank #221 of 995 sites in the E:LAB STUDIO database.
Is samsung.com visible to AI search engines like ChatGPT?
With an AI-visibility score of 65/100, it is comparatively well prepared: structured data and a clear content structure make it citable by AI answer engines.
What technology does samsung.com use?
No specific framework or CMS was detectable from its public HTML.
What should samsung.com fix first?
Based on this report: Organization schema, Author / publish date present. The full prioritized list is in the "How to improve" section below.
When was this report generated?
On August 2, 2026, from publicly fetched HTML. Anyone can re-run the analysis for free to refresh it.
Compare with similar sites
Free website checkers
Add this score badge to your site
Copy the snippet to show a live E:LAB STUDIO badge that links back to this report.