commons.wikimedia.org SEO & AI Search Report
Wikimedia Commons
Analyzed 6/2/2026, 1:44:05 PM · https://commons.wikimedia.org
⚠ No sitemap.xml found at site root.
Summary
As of June 2, 2026, commons.wikimedia.org scores 69/100 overall (grade C), ranking #228 of 992 websites in the E:LAB STUDIO database — the top 23%. Its strongest area is Technical (75/100); its weakest is Schema (60/100).
Its AI-search visibility (AEO) score is 70/100 — a measure of how citable the page is to AI answer engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity. 3 structured-data types detected (Article, Organization, ImageObject). Top fixes: FAQ schema, Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic), Price/product info.
Detected tech stack: MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.4. Compared with the database average (53/100 overall), commons.wikimedia.org scores 16 points higher.
Detected technologies
SEO
- ✓Title tag present10/10
- ✗Meta description present0/10
- ✓H1 heading present10/10
- ✓Canonical URL set10/10
- ✓Open Graph tags present10/10
- ✗sitemap.xml found0/10
- ✓robots.txt found10/10
- ◐Images have alt text1/10
- ✓Internal links present10/10
- ✓Structured data present10/10
AI Visibility (AEO)
- ✓Organization schema15/15
- ✗FAQ schema0/15
- ◐Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic)5/15
- ✓Company/brand identity (About page or Org schema)10/10
- ✓Author / publish date present10/10
- ✓Structured heading (single clear H1)10/10
- ✓External source/citation links10/10
- ✓Industry/location info10/10
- ✗Price/product info0/5
Schema
- ✓Any JSON-LD present20/20
- ✓Organization15/15
- ✗FAQPage0/15
- ✗LocalBusiness0/15
- ✓Article or Product15/15
- ✗Breadcrumb0/10
- ✓Author/date structured10/10
Technical
- ✓robots.txt found15/15
- ✗sitemap.xml found0/15
- ✓Canonical URL set15/15
- ✓Mobile viewport meta15/15
- ✓Language attribute set10/10
- ✓Open Graph tags10/10
- ✓Title length is optimal10/10
- ✗Description length is optimal0/10
How to improve
Based on this report, here are the highest-impact fixes for SEO and AI-search visibility:
- →Meta description present: Add a <meta name="description"> summarizing the page.
- →sitemap.xml found: Publish sitemap.xml and submit it in Search Console.
- →Images have alt text: Add descriptive alt text to your images.
- →FAQ schema: Add FAQPage JSON-LD — AI answer engines frequently cite FAQs.
- →Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic): Add clearer, more substantial text describing your service.
- →Price/product info: Add Product/Offer details with pricing where relevant.
- →FAQPage: Add FAQPage schema.
- →LocalBusiness: Add LocalBusiness schema with address and hours.
- →Breadcrumb: Add BreadcrumbList schema for clearer navigation.
- →Description length is optimal: Aim for ~50–160 characters (longer is fine for CJK).
Want a higher score than this site?
Analyze your own site free and get a prioritized fix list.
Analyze my siteFAQ about commons.wikimedia.org
What is commons.wikimedia.org's SEO score?
commons.wikimedia.org scores 71/100 for on-page SEO and 69/100 overall (grade C) — rank #228 of 992 sites in the E:LAB STUDIO database.
Is commons.wikimedia.org visible to AI search engines like ChatGPT?
With an AI-visibility score of 70/100, it is comparatively well prepared: structured data and a clear content structure make it citable by AI answer engines.
What technology does commons.wikimedia.org use?
From its public HTML we detected MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.4.
What should commons.wikimedia.org fix first?
Based on this report: FAQ schema, Substantive, descriptive content (heuristic). The full prioritized list is in the "How to improve" section below.
When was this report generated?
On June 2, 2026, from publicly fetched HTML. Anyone can re-run the analysis for free to refresh it.
Compare with similar sites
Add this score badge to your site
Copy the snippet to show a live E:LAB STUDIO badge that links back to this report.